What's new

New Energy level

Hoffy1234

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
What is the use of the upgrade to the energy levels we can hold. I was led to believe that the upgrade would be to allow two materializes not one and a half.

Come on guys re-think would be good. :sneaky:
 

hody

Active member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Agreed. Seems like a big waste of time. Players should be able to mat twice or what is the point?


hody...
 

tazzdevil

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
186
Reaction score
1
well I have to agree as well....whats the point to give us for 2k more E when I cant mat my self twice???
It only good for players with 75% membership,so they can shot longer. Otherwise its useless......I vote for more E in E cap or lwr E for mat.....!!!! mTazzdevil
 

Ahsoka

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
I agree. the E cap needs to be 25% more than the 1 we have now and the Remat should be 30-40% of your E cap.




Ahsoka - Biggest Noob Ingame
 

ridoi

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
1
self matt should be liek this
r 1 ship 0 e r 3 ship 50 e etc
 

pbhuh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
87
ridoi said:
self matt should be liek this
r 1 ship 0 e r 3 ship 50 e etc
no, half your capacity, that way ppl with membership can mat 2 times and normal ppl 1 time.
 

ridoi

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
1
pbhuh said:
ridoi said:
self matt should be liek this
r 1 ship 0 e r 3 ship 50 e etc
no, half your capacity, that way ppl with membership can mat 2 times and normal ppl 1 time.

it was a example dude, and why should a vega ship maybe pay 5k e to mat?
 

pbhuh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
87
ridoi said:
pbhuh said:
ridoi said:
self matt should be liek this
r 1 ship 0 e r 3 ship 50 e etc
no, half your capacity, that way ppl with membership can mat 2 times and normal ppl 1 time.

it was a example dude, and why should a vega ship maybe pay 5k e to mat?
why? because otherwise you can just go to vega and remat million times. Thats why
 

ridoi

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
1
pbhuh said:
ridoi said:
pbhuh said:
ridoi said:
self matt should be liek this
r 1 ship 0 e r 3 ship 50 e etc
no, half your capacity, that way ppl with membership can mat 2 times and normal ppl 1 time.

it was a example dude, and why should a vega ship maybe pay 5k e to mat?
why? because otherwise you can just go to vega and remat million times. Thats why

why not it should be handy then using like 5000 e for a very very small ship...
 

pbhuh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
87
wow what would it be fair on conquest, 1 guy can mat million times and another one 1 time, thats fair.
 

ridoi

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
1
pbhuh said:
wow what would it be fair on conquest, 1 guy can mat million times and another one 1 time, thats fair.
a million times, now your taking this to far :eek: u will be able to matt a part times but it's more worth to go to hanger then come back -.- would u really use like 1000 to matt like 8 times?
 

Ahsoka

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
pbhuh said:
ridoi said:
pbhuh said:
ridoi said:
self matt should be liek this
r 1 ship 0 e r 3 ship 50 e etc
no, half your capacity, that way ppl with membership can mat 2 times and normal ppl 1 time.

it was a example dude, and why should a vega ship maybe pay 5k e to mat?
why? because otherwise you can just go to vega and remat million times. Thats why
1 word, OBSERED
 

ace55

New member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
i was reading above,and i was thinking about this..for example a player who is rank 65 uses a rank 10 ship should use the same amount of energy like a player who has really rank 10 in a rank 10 ship..so i am saying to mat energy to be depending on the ship u are using:)
 

Ahsoka

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
i was thinking more of having the Death Cry back to how it was, and have the Remat Dependent on what ship ur in.

For Example;
R1 you drop 0 cry and takes 0 e to remat.
R60 you drop 1034 cry and takes 2350 e to Remat.

So Pbhuh, why do we need to spend money on this game for again? It does say FREE MMO in the Homepage and thats how it should be, except for the Memberships and all that.
 

pbhuh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
87
Ahsoka said:
i was thinking more of having the Death Cry back to how it was, and have the Remat Dependent on what ship ur in.

For Example;
R1 you drop 0 cry and takes 0 e to remat.
R60 you drop 1034 cry and takes 2350 e to Remat.

So Pbhuh, why do we need to spend money on this game for again? It does say FREE MMO in the Homepage and thats how it should be, except for the Memberships and all that.
SS made it unbalanced, I have mulitple proove that draconis is not for free, but your ideas are the opposide, i want a balanced version.

Cryonite shuold be based on ship, teh only reason why ss based it on rank was because you wuld have to pay 3000 cryonite for a remat on a rank 70 ship, adn thats is way to high.

But ss culd also have tuoght more well and took the old and balance it,

And remat on ship doesn't work, come on, if a rank 70 player would be in a rank 10 ship he can remat 8500:600 times, thats more then 12 times, that makes no sence and wuldn't be fair on cq.
 

Ahsoka

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
pbhuh said:
Ahsoka said:
i was thinking more of having the Death Cry back to how it was, and have the Remat Dependent on what ship ur in.

For Example;
R1 you drop 0 cry and takes 0 e to remat.
R60 you drop 1034 cry and takes 2350 e to Remat.

So Pbhuh, why do we need to spend money on this game for again? It does say FREE MMO in the Homepage and thats how it should be, except for the Memberships and all that.
SS made it unbalanced, I have mulitple proove that draconis is not for free, but your ideas are the opposide, i want a balanced version.

Cryonite shuold be based on ship, teh only reason why ss based it on rank was because you wuld have to pay 3000 cryonite for a remat on a rank 70 ship, adn thats is way to high.

But ss culd also have tuoght more well and took the old and balance it,

And remat on ship doesn't work, come on, if a rank 70 player would be in a rank 10 ship he can remat 8500:600 times, thats more then 12 times, that makes no sence and wuldn't be fair on cq.
as far as i'm awair u can't Remat in a CQ
 

pbhuh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
87
i didn't know that, never been there in month's because it's no longer fun, but 12 tmes is way toohigh.
 

Ahsoka

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
pbhuh said:
i didn't know that, never been there in month's because it's no longer fun, but 12 tmes is way toohigh.
not to me xD

anything below 12 is way too small
 

pbhuh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
87
Ahsoka said:
pbhuh said:
i didn't know that, never been there in month's because it's no longer fun, but 12 tmes is way toohigh.
not to me xD

anything below 12 is way too small
well, thats not how ss thinks.
 

Ahsoka

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
pbhuh said:
Ahsoka said:
pbhuh said:
i didn't know that, never been there in month's because it's no longer fun, but 12 tmes is way toohigh.
not to me xD

anything below 12 is way too small
well, thats not how ss thinks.
You sure? i like my idea so it's more Balanced ^^
 
Top