Fleet Conquest Issues (Possible expoit in mechanics)

[metasak7]

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen of Pirate Galaxy. I want to make a public complaint, since the GMs have ignored my complaints. Witches of galaxy is cheating in the fleet rankings, as they are cheating left and right.

 

[Christian]

I want to raise my complaint because for months the fleet Witches of Galaxy, from the alliance Supremacy of Magic, has been constantly cheating, and this month it was extremely blatant with blockages and maneuvers just to secure the first place; what is most concerning is that despite repeated evidence, the GMs have taken no action, which seriously harms the players who compete fairly.

 

[H.Mago.De.Oz.H]

I want to complain about cheating in the Conquest ranking system on Gaia (again). The GMs reply to reports saying they can’t do anything unless one of the people involved admits to the cheating. So what then? Do we all go back to cheating like before, and let the fleet that cheats the most win cryonite and skulls?


The fleets involved are “Witches of Galaxy” and their allies from the “Supremacy of Magic” alliance.
This fleet maintains fraudulent CQs, even going as far as connecting secondary accounts in extreme cases just to enlist and farm points and cryonite.


For more context, check the ranking tables and the movement of pilots within that alliance, as well as who they fought against and how the points were distributed. I say this because when these fleets fight properly, against others outside their alliance, they always lose badly — usually not even getting more than 20% to 30%. For the rest of us, that’s just not fair.

 

[roy.bau18]

Since no one is responding to our tickets, I want to report that on the Gaia server, the fleet Witches of the Galaxy arranges conquests with fleets inside and outside their alliance to accumulate ranking points. In addition, they use multiple accounts on the same server to achieve this. The GMs ignore this and do not implement any measures to ensure fair play for the other fleets.

 

[guardianofdremas]

Good evening, I would like to express my point of view about some irregularities in the fleet´s conquests, specifically with Witches Of Galaxy fleet and alliance. I don´t know if the agreements between fleets are allowed to secure high positions in ranking, but I think this kind of situations could go against the gameplay goals. So, I would like to see GM´s opinion about this and how we can solve the "agreements".

Thanks for reading.

 

[Wolkblade]

This can be resolved without making many changes to the game. A limiter could be added. This limiter would cause fleets that have already battled within the season time frame to receive disadvantages (only 10% or 20% cryonite and conquest points). This would be a viable solution. For now, the golden skulls of the fleet do not benefit anyone, however, the cryonite from private CQ benefits many. As the game system is not able to detect this type of situation, I believe my suggestion is coherent.

 

[Highway]

It would be great to get more info about how the mechanics are "played" to gain unfair advantage for the current conquest system.

 

[Fission]

Hello Pilots,

We understand your concerns regarding the fleet rankings and recent disputes. It’s important to clarify that fights between clans that are not enemies are not considered an exploit. The matchmaking system is specifically designed to balance encounters and ensure fairness across the board.

All fleets have an equal opportunity of being selected for battles, provided they commit the appropriate amount of Mining Tickets. This mechanism prevents manipulation and ensures that results reflect the investment and dedication of each clan.

We encourage everyone to continue competing with fairness and respect. If you have evidence of behavior outside the system’s rules, please continue reporting through the official channels such as support system so it can be reviewed.

Thank you for your passion and commitment to Pirate Galaxy.

 

[wilmer gelvis]

They are simply complaints from one fleet to another trying to harm it.

 

[Zeitate]

First, they should mature their brains. Then, let go of the frustration of losing. And finally, let go of resentment and dedicate themselves to playing.

 

[ClockWire]

Hey guys,

There aren’t any rules against jumping from one clan to another. You’ll still have the 3 day cooldown and need to collect more mining tickets if your clan loses.

It’s not really exploiting just working the system.

But if someone’s running two accounts at the same time, that’s definitely against the rules. If you’ve got proof, send to Fission or send it to support.

 

[Pompeyus]

Lloros of Galaxy


I only see resentment and obsession, the same as always.
Blaze of Heaven, are you sure you’re not showing the same behaviors you complain about?
I don’t know if you’re 11 or 30years old

 

[Pompeyus]

@Mago supera el trauma y sé feliz, cómo así que mandando mensajes a otras flotas para que te apoyen en el foro XDDD

 

[H.Mago.De.Oz.H]

It would be great to get more info about how the mechanics are "played" to gain unfair advantage for the current conquest system.

It’s simple: they have multiple secondary accounts and fleets, and they arrange CQs between themselves using those secondary fleets (by spending more archives than the other fleets with the secondaries). They move pilots and/or secondary accounts around and in this way maintain enough accounts to make several fleets fight each other, ensuring that the main fleet earns more points than the rest.


In other cases, if their ranking is at risk, they do the same thing so that other fleets can’t go out and score points.


Proof? After sending clear logs of account movements, the GMs say: “We can’t do anything unless someone from inside confirms the cheating.” That’s like asking a thief to confess, otherwise you can’t punish him.


You can see account connection logs, we can’t. Want to check someone? Review the IP connections of the accounts: - FreSsa -, Lov, Engel Angel, -Treadway- or similar. Check the IP and connection logs and fix this.

 

[Daroga]

Blaze of Heaven wants to stay in CQ by entering 1 ticket every day. Someone explain to him how the math works

LMAO

 

[Zeitate]

Jajajajaja

 

[NinjaFlow]

Pfff, R.I.P. Gaia

 

[Alinoe]

But if someone’s running two accounts at the same time, that’s definitely against the rules. If you’ve got proof, send to Fission or send it to support.

Serious question... As regular players how the hell you're supposed to prove that? You can't even spectate a conquest or anything so... how?

 

[Pompeyus]

It’s simple: they have multiple secondary accounts and fleets, and they arrange CQs between themselves using those secondary fleets (by spending more archives than the other fleets with the secondaries). They move pilots and/or secondary accounts around and in this way maintain enough accounts to make several fleets fight each other, ensuring that the main fleet earns more points than the rest.


In other cases, if their ranking is at risk, they do the same thing so that other fleets can’t go out and score points.


Proof? After sending clear logs of account movements, the GMs say: “We can’t do anything unless someone from inside confirms the cheating.” That’s like asking a thief to confess, otherwise you can’t punish him.


You can see account connection logs, we can’t. Want to check someone? Review the IP connections of the accounts: - FreSsa -, Lov, Engel Angel, -Treadway- or similar. Check the IP and connection logs and fix this.

Check ips off Rafael, Kokodril, SanCris and the multiaccounts Amon Ra, who's nickname was SISHU and constantly changes it (already banned multiple times even for global harrasment) kids

 

[ClockWire]

Serious question... As regular players how the hell you're supposed to prove that? You can't even spectate a conquest or anything so... how?

if you suspect that an individual is using multiple accounts, you may collect the relevant username two or more as necessary and submit them to support. The accounts will then be reviewed and compared, and appropriate action will be taken based on the findings.